The goal is to explain the product's qualities and traits as precisely as possible to eliminate ambiguity or uncertainty about what is required. To guarantee that the documentation specifies the solution and that there is low risk in proceeding with the deliverables, rigorous evaluations and approvals might be incorporated. 

Although this approach is entirely reasonable given the type of deliverable (for example, you would hope an architect would be very clear about load-bearing specs on a skyscraper or bridge before the team pours the footings in the foundation), it doesn't work so well when the customer doesn't know what they need. 

"I Will recognise it when I see it," you may have heard. This indicates that using Agile methodologies will benefit our project delivery strategy the most.

Agile demands a different attitude, one that is flexible and adaptable to the needs of your project. To be efficient, we must delegate decision-making to the project team, which works directly with the client. This necessitates the removal of work obstacles and the organization's management adopting a more serving rather than directing role. 

However, delegating decision-making and being adaptable does not imply a lack of organizational discipline; to attain a high level of effectiveness and efficiency, it might easily be argued that more is required.

This is where DASSM (Disciplined Agile Senior Scrum Master) Certification may help by developing a decision framework to help steer the team and organization down the proper project delivery route. Once we have it, we can grasp the processes used, which assists alignment and communication, two of Agile's most challenging difficulties.

Let's take a quick look at the seven Disciplined Agile Principles discussed in the following points: 

Customers Delight: We all want to be serviced in a way that exceeds our expectations. It requires a concentrated effort to show the consumer something they did not expect, whether via the simplicity of the design, attention to detail, proof of complete knowledge of the requirement, or simply timely communication—that "WOW!" reaction.

Be Amazing: We need an excellent team for our deliverables to be high quality. A high-performing squad, to be particular. The highest performers raise the other team members' technical, relational, organizational, and leadership skills.

Pragmatism: That is not a stunning revelation, but we must adjust to what we can manage for teams to be effective. We optimise what we have; whether it's with the team members we're working with or through the tools and other resources available, to produce as effectively and efficiently as feasible.

Context is everything: The most ineffective companies try to apply the same set of rules and controls to all initiatives. This is hard to do since one of the significant criteria of a project is that it is a "one-of-a-kind venture." And it is provided by one-of-a-kind businesses, teams, and individuals.

Choice Is Beneficial: Companies often seek the one proper set of best practices that apply to every circumstance they face. It's as if we're hunting for the holy grail of operational efficiency. One issue with this is that organizations exist in flux between predictability and disorder. There are numerous aspects that the organization cannot control. Thus we must recognize that there are many excellent practices to follow rather than a single set of best practices.

Optimize Flow: Lean and Agile ideas are well-known in most businesses. The learning necessary to deliver more effectively and efficiently serves as the foundation for these principles. All components of these techniques stem from how the company, team, and people learn, eliminating waste and inefficiency.

Enterprise Awareness: One of the essential components of Disciplined Agile compared to other Agile frameworks is the notion of ensuring cross-team communication. Yes, we want to decentralize decision-making, but the most significant judgments are made in how the decision will affect the organization.